A second bill to overhaul Ohio鈥檚 election system has been proposed by some Republican state lawmakers, and this one is stricter than one introduced a few months ago that was deemed controversial by voting rights advocates.
While some states that have seen major election overhaul bills proposed were red states that President Biden won, . But this bill takes aim at some of the biggest complaints that Republicans have had.
鈥淚t would eliminate drop boxes, drastically cut early voting, and put extreme limits on voting by mail," said Jen Miller, the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio.
Miller said would eliminate secure ballot drop boxes at board of elections sites. It would cut the 28 day early voting period that鈥檚 been in place since 2014 to 13 days, and then later to six days. It would bring back the requirement eliminated with the expansion of early voting to provide an excuse to ask for a mail in ballot, such as illness or extended travel. It would also ban the secretary of state from mailing out absentee ballot applications in even-year general elections, which has been happening since 2012.
Rep. Scott Wiggam (R-Wooster) is among the six conservative Republicans joining on the legislation behind sponsor Bill Dean (R-Xenia). Wiggam said he believes strongly in shortening the early voting period.
鈥淭here's all sorts of information that's coming out that may change voters鈥� minds as an election approaches to that election day," Wiggam said. "I mean, what's the difference between 30 and 40 and 50? How about a year of early voting? How many days do you actually have to have in order to go vote?鈥�
Wiggam said he鈥檚 also concerned about the security of ballot drop boxes. He also said if mail-in voting is limited to those with certain excuses, there鈥檚 no reason for the secretary of state to send out absentee ballot applications.
However the Secretary of State Frank LaRose, also a Republican, isn鈥檛 on board with these suggestions. LaRose has said the 2020 vote .
鈥淲e don't need to make massive changes to the way Ohio runs elections because we have what is in many ways the gold standard that every other state should aspire to," LaRose said. "And so that's why I've not been interested in a massive overhaul of Ohio鈥檚 elections.鈥�
LaRose supports , sponsored by Republican Reps. Bill Seitz (R-Cincinnati) and Sharon Ray (R-Medina).
The bill would create on an online ballot request system with two forms of ID, and would allow ballot dropboxes only at boards of elections to be used for 10 days before the election. It would shorten the window to request early ballots and ban in-person voting the day before the election, but doesn鈥檛 dramatically shorten the early voting period. However Seitz has said his yes vote on the bill to approve early no-fault absentee voting is the one vote he regrets in his time in the legislature.
as extreme.
While Wiggam said Ohio doesn鈥檛 have the problems he sees in other states, he said House Bill 294 doesn鈥檛 go far enough. In fact, he suggests other changes, including potentially doing what he calls a "forensic audit" on last year鈥檚 election.
鈥淚 acknowledge full well that the Secretary of State's job and getting reelected would be to say it's the best dang election in the whole entire United States. I get that," Wiggam said. "The fact of the matter is I think that he and the rest of Ohio could agree that we should ought to be always looking at the integrity of our election, and we shouldn't be afraid of doing that.鈥�
LaRose noted , there鈥檚 a cast and that there was an audit of the 2020 vote a few weeks after it 鈥� and there was no dispute over the results.
鈥淎s far as the representative questioning the integrity of our elections, I would encourage him to educate himself on this, because if he did that, what he would find is that Ohio runs honest elections that are trustworthy, administered in a bipartisan way,鈥� he said.
LaRose has said of people either illegally registering to vote or voting illegally, which represents .0012% of the more than 8 million people who were registered to vote in Ohio last year. Miller with the League of Women Voters notes those instances of alleged voter fraud are often dismissed.
But she said if House Bill 387 backed by Wiggam passes, it would mean many voters would be disenfranchised, especially people of color, people with disabilities and military voters overseas.
鈥淚 think we would see long lines on Election Day and during early vote, we would have overburdened election officials who are implementing policies that are unnecessary but time-consuming. And actually, the voter registration rules may run afoul of federal law," Miller said.
And it almost certainly would mean a lawsuit against the state by voting rights groups 鈥� which Wiggam said doesn鈥檛 worry him.
Copyright 2021 The Statehouse News Bureau. To see more, visit .
