Ohio's constitution is caught in a high-stakes tug-of-war.
With an looming this fall, an influential mix of Republican politicians, lobbying organizations and business interests is positioning to try to make another change to the state's founding document first. They're pushing an amendment that would raise the threshold for passing future constitutional changes, including the abortion question, from the current 50%-plus-one .
鈥淭his issue isn鈥檛 just about abortion,鈥� said Ohio Right to Life President Mike Gonidakis, who represented a cross-section of conservative causes at recent strategy talks on the subject. 鈥淭his is about family farming. This is about small businesses. This is around Second Amendment rights, setting the minimum wage.鈥�
Despite that powerful line-up of conservative support, getting the 60% question to the ballot this August has been fraught with complications.
First, there's the fact that Statehouse Republicans voted to eliminate most August special elections last year. GOP Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, the state's elections chief and a likely 2024 U.S. Senate candidate, was among the measure's highest profile supporters, testifying: 鈥淭hese unnecessary 鈥榦ff-cycle鈥� elections aren鈥檛 good for taxpayers, election officials or the civic health of our state. It鈥檚 time for them to go!鈥�
LaRose and powerful Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman, a fellow Republican, have now changed course, realizing the political stakes. Both favor reinstating August elections 鈥� at least, just this once 鈥� after lawmakers for a May vote. LaRose says a well-publicized statewide issue 鈥渋s a very different thing鈥� than the low turnout local ballot questions he opined against in December.
The swiftly timed reversal didn't go over well with Republican Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens, who has struggled to conduct business with a .
鈥淟et me be abundantly clear. I am and have always been 100% Pro-Life,鈥� Stephens tweeted on March 24. 鈥淚 will stand for life at every turn; however, I am not for changing the rules willy nilly at a whim when it comes to changing our constitution.鈥� Among Stephens' concerns were the burden and expense an August election would impose on already .
Stephens has since called August 鈥渁 possibility.鈥� Those comments came the same day fellow Republicans launched an and push the 60% threshold resolution directly to the House floor. The effort would prevent Stephens from delaying a vote past May 10, the deadline for a $20 million August election the resolution will reinstate.
鈥淩epublicans aren鈥檛 going to put it on the same ballot as the abortion issue,鈥� said ex-House Constitutional Resolutions Committee Chair Scott Wiggam, whom Stephens ousted as chair after he worked at cross purposes to his own committee by signing the petition. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 because if they both pass with 50%-plus-one, then abortion would be protected by a 60% threshold into the future.鈥�
That's not to say it would even pass if it reaches the floor.
A lack of the necessary three-fifths majority tanked during last year's lame duck session 鈥� and not just because minority Democrats and a organized against it are opposed.
Among Republicans, some constitutional purists worry about the of changing a simple majority requirement in place since 1912. Others are concerned about opposition to the idea among GOP voters, particularly in rural areas that look unkindly on government overreach.
About a dozen sitting GOP lawmakers, for instance, supported the legislative version of a pending aimed at preventing COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Diana Smith, the conservative from Bradford in western Ohio who is gathering signatures for that effort, said it's unfair to require its backers to win an additional 10% of the Ohio electorate.
鈥淲hether you鈥檙e Republican or Democrat, we鈥檙e all citizens, we鈥檙e all one,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t鈥檚 been in our Constitution that one greater than 50% should be the majority, and I feel that it should stay that way, that we the people are the ones that should be in charge of our government.鈥�
Rob Sexton, legislative affairs director for the Buckeye Firearms Association, is among the coalition of groups in the pushing for the 60% requirement. They are watching or amendments pass in other states with trepidation.
鈥淏allot issues, in general, have increasingly become almost completely influenced by whoever has the most money,鈥� he said. 鈥淪o when you鈥檙e talking about our state鈥檚 foundational document, then we believe it needs protection from large national organizations that may not have Ohio values but are able to bankroll multi-million ballot campaigns in our state.鈥�
In Ohio, 59% of voters in last year鈥檚 midterm elections said abortion should be legal in most or all cases, according to AP VoteCast, an expansive survey of over 90,000 U.S. voters. Only 7% of Ohio voters said abortion should be illegal in all cases.
The way its Republican backers have overtly tied the 60% idea to sinking an abortion rights measure that could potentially prevail in Ohio otherwise appears to have weakened would-be support elsewhere.
Two of the state's most powerful pro-business groups 鈥� the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and the Ohio Business Roundtable 鈥� have so far remained neutral on both amendments.
The Chamber hosted and the Roundtable attended the March strategy meeting with Gonidakis; state Rep. Brian Stewart, the resolution鈥檚 sponsor; Wiggam and others whose support for the higher threshold is unrelated to abortion. But the two heavy hitters 鈥� run by former Republican U.S. Reps. Steve Stivers and Pat Tiberi, respectively 鈥� generally don't wade into social issues on which their corporate members, and the state, might be divided.
While the proposal's immediate targets are abortion rights, , a minimum wage increase and redistricting reform, some conservatives recognize a 60% threshold could hurt their own future constitutional efforts.
The conservative American Policy Roundtable, which has backed a host of successful Ohio constitutional amendments over the years, is opposed, for example.
Across the U.S., states are declaring constitutional rights to , , and . Meanwhile, in Wyoming just last month, the constitutional right to make one's own healthcare decisions 鈥� added to constitutions in Ohio and elsewhere in a push by opponents of the federal Affordable Care Act 鈥� was used to . That could prompt conservatives to try to repeal it someday.