Drug companies may try to turn the tables on Cuyahoga County in the coming federal opioid trial, presenting evidence on the troubled the county jail and in the department of children and family services in an effort to minimize the role of their drugs in local problems.
With jury selection scheduled to begin next week and opening statements set for Oct. 21, attorneys for both sides are disputing which evidence and witnesses should be presented at trial.
In late September, plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Dan Polster to prevent defendants from mentioning deaths and investigations at the county jail, saying the topics are irrelevant to the opioid case.
This week, drug companies countered that Cuyahoga County may have itself to blame for the damage caused by opioids in jail. Defense attorneys said they might bring up alleged drug smuggling by county jail guards.
鈥淒efendants are also entitled to introduce evidence showing how corruption of County officials led to failures to address the opioid crisis, as well as evidence showing that the County Sheriff鈥檚 Department did not adequately address opioid-related harms and criminal activities that had nothing to do with defendants, including illicit opioid dealing by the County鈥檚 own employees,鈥� drug company attorneys wrote in an Oct. 7 court filing.
Drug industry defendants submitted a list of possible witnesses that includes former jail director Ken Mills and former director of ambulatory care Gary Brack, who last year accused Mills of blocking the hiring of jail nurses.
to charges that he lied to Cuyahoga County Council about hiring more nurses and .
Plaintiffs sought this week to remove Brack and several others from the list of defense witnesses, saying drug company attorneys didn鈥檛 disclose their names during discovery. Plaintiffs鈥� attorneys have also asked Polster to bar defendants from referring to media coverage of the Cuyahoga County justice system, including the podcast Serial.
Defense attorneys this week said they don鈥檛 plan to discuss Serial.
Attorneys for the drug company defendants indicated they might discuss , a 4-year-old who was killed by her mother and mother鈥檚 boyfriend. The attorneys wrote that increased calls to the department in the wake of Day-Garrett's death shows that opioids alone aren鈥檛 the cause of a growing caseload.
Defendants also want to stop plaintiffs鈥� attorneys from mentioning drug companies鈥� profits and bar them from asking if witnesses feel responsible for the opioid crisis. They also want Polster to prohibit plaintiffs from asking witnesses to share personal stories about opioid use.
Polster has not yet ruled on the motions.
Copyright 2021 90.3 WCPN ideastream. To see more, visit . 9(MDA5NTM4MTIyMDE0MTg3NDc2MTVlZjdmNQ001))
